JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
JB Accepts, published online ahead of print on 2 May 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JB.00074-08v1
190/13/4532    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Youn, H.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, G. P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Youn, H.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, G. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Bacteriol. doi:10.1128/JB.00074-08
Copyright (c) 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Two-state allosteric modeling suggests protein equilibrium as an integral component for cAMP specificity in the cAMP receptor protein of Escherichia coli

Hwan Youn, Junseock Koh, and Gary P. Roberts*

Departments of Bacteriology, and Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: groberts{at}bact.wisc.edu.


   Abstract

Activation of the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) from Escherichia coli is highly specific to its allosteric ligand, cAMP. Ligands such as adenosine and cGMP, which are structurally similar to cAMP, fail to activate wild-type CRP. However, several cAMP-independent CRP variants (termed CRP*) exist that can be further activated by both adenosine and cGMP, as well as by cAMP. This has remained a puzzle because the substitutions in many of these CRP* variants lie far from the cAMP-binding pocket (>10 Å) and therefore should not directly affect that pocket. Here we show a surprising similarity in the altered ligand specificity of four CRP* variants with a single substitution in D53S, G141K, A144T, or L148K, and we propose a common basis for this phenomenon. The increased active protein population caused by an equilibrium shift in these variants is hypothesized to preferentially stabilize ligand binding. This explanation is completely consistent with the cAMP specificity in the activation of wild-type CRP. The model also predicts that WT CRP should be activated even by the lower affinity ligand, adenosine, which we experimentally confirmed. The study demonstrates that protein equilibrium is an integral factor for ligand specificity in an allosteric protein, in addition to the direct effects of ligand pocket residues.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.